SUBSCRIBE

Breaking News on Food, Beverage & Supplement Development - Asia PacificEU edition | US edition

Headlines > Policy

Read more breaking news

 

 

Heavy metals from China's farmland put consumers in Australia at risk

2 commentsBy RJ Whitehead , 24-Apr-2014
Last updated on 24-Apr-2014 at 08:34 GMT2014-04-24T08:34:23Z

Heavy metals from China's farmland put consumers in Australia at risk

The risk of consuming harmful heavy metals by eating produce from China’s heavily polluted farmland is now so great that one Australian industry body has warned a parliamentary inquiry due to look into country-of-origin labelling laws that current requirements put the health of consumers at risk.

Data recently released by the Communist Party of China indicates that almost one-fifth of the country’s agricultural land—or approximately 1m sq-km—is contaminated by toxic metals such as cadmium, nickel and arsenic, which can be carcinogenic and cause kidney damage.

Two decades of explosive industrial growth, the misuse of agricultural chemicals and minimal environmental protection were cited as the major contributing factors to China’s declining soil safety.

‘Mortifying’ findings

Considering China is the number two source of vegetable imports to Australia, these findings are mortifying,” said Hugh Gurney of AusVeg, which represents Australia’s vegetable and potato growers.

Last year, it was estimated that approximately A$110m (US$93m) worth of vegetables were imported to Australia from China; however, Gurney said the amount of potentially harmful Chinese produce reaching Australian dinner plates is likely to be much higher than official figures suggest.

Under current trade agreements with China, New Zealand may import processed vegetables from China, repackage them as ‘Made in New Zealand from local and imported ingredients’, and ship the product to Australia for consumption.

The risk associated with the consumption of Chinese produce is now indisputable. We should not allow inadequate Country of Origin Labelling requirements continue to put the health of Australian consumers at risk.”

Federal inquiry

A parliamentary inquiry recently announced by the federal government will investigate country-of-origin labelling and examine whether the current system is satisfactory, where improvements can be made, the current levels of compliance, and whether laws are being sidestepped by importers through third-party countries.

AusVeg welcomes the inquiry and calls for a thorough investigation of current country-of-origin labelling laws, to allow Australian consumers to easily identify foreign produce. It would be shameful to continue to let ineffective country-of-origin-labelling legislation impede Australian consumers from making well-informed choices at the supermarket,” added Gurney.

AusVeg’s stance, however, is at odds with that of the Australian Food and Grocery Council, which believes current labelling policy is largely sufficient. 

The AFGC will be making submissions to the House of Representatives Inquiry supporting the current laws that prohibit false, misleading or deceptive representations about the origin of goods,” an AFGC spokesman told FoodNavigator-Asia by email.

There are some aspects of the current laws that the AFGC considers can be improved, but the basic structure seems to be working well and is being enforced, with action being taken by both federal and state/territory agencies to stop misleading origin statements.”

2 comments (Comments are now closed)

A little science may go a long way.....

Having read this article I am concerned by the apparent lack of scientific validation in regards to the toxic contamination issue. Plants have self regulating mechanisms as far as toxicity is concerned, which means that although high levels of a particular element (in this case immobile metals) may be present in soil, this is by no way an indication that equivalent concentrations of that element will then be effectively 'taken-up' by the plant to the point where it represents a risk to the final consumers health.
What worries me here, that the toxicity issue is simply a thinly veiled attack on the availability of cost competitive imported vegetables and the labelling standards currently required for such products.

Report abuse

Posted by Gary Price
03 May 2014 | 09h282014-05-03T09:28:01Z

AusVeg is correct

AusVeg is correct; we need much better labelling of our foods here in Australia so that we, the consumers, can make an INFORMED choice about the origin of foods we choose to eat. At the moment this is impossible.
"Processed in Australia from local and imported ingredients" provides no useful information whatsoever.

Report abuse

Posted by Del Edwards
25 April 2014 | 07h372014-04-25T07:37:37Z

Related products

Related suppliers